SweepCHECK
Chrome extension: soon
← All Renault models
Model reliability

Renault Twingo reliability

The Renault Twingo fails its MOT about as often as most cars over 10 years old: 44.4% of 13,729 tests failed in 2023, against 39.7% on average.

Up to 5 years old
16.1% failed their MOT
Worse than most
From 1,039 MOT tests of Renault Twingos this age.
Where it does worse than other cars this age
Fails 3× as oftenWipers5.6% vs 2.1%
Fails 56% more oftenTyre tread depth2.5% vs 1.6%Fix about £90
Fails 4× as oftenSuspension arms1.3% vs 0.3%
6 to 10 years old
27.9% failed their MOT
About average
From 11,553 MOT tests of Renault Twingos this age.
Where it does worse than other cars this age
Fails 2× as oftenSuspension arms5.3% vs 2.3%
Fails 2× as oftenExhaust emissions4.7% vs 2%Fix about £150
Fails 44% more oftenTyre tread depth3.6% vs 2.5%Fix about £90
Fails 33% more oftenSprings3.2% vs 2.4%Fix about £150
Over 10 years old
44.4% failed their MOT
About average
From 13,729 MOT tests of Renault Twingos this age.
Where it does worse than other cars this age
Fails 2× as oftenSprings9.7% vs 4.1%Fix about £150
Fails 3× as oftenSteering linkage components8.1% vs 2.4%
Fails 31% more oftenWashers4.6% vs 3.5%
Fails 3× as oftenRigid brake pipes4.5% vs 1.7%Fix about £120
Advised 2× as oftenRigid brake pipes17.2% vs 8.3%Fix about £120
Advised 88% more oftenAnti-roll bars11.3% vs 6%
Advised 50% more oftenRegistration plate lamp(s)7.8% vs 5.2%Fix about £30
Advised 6× as oftenMacpherson strut5.9% vs 1%
Safety recalls

11 DVSA recalls for the Renault Twingo

Most cover a batch of cars built in a set period, and dealers fix them free. Sweep’s check shows the recalls for a car’s age and whether the DVSA has one outstanding.

R/2017/31328 Nov 2017Risk of degradation to the front left sub axle carrier

Depending on driving style and road profile there is a risk of degradation of the front left sub axle carrier.

Fix: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and checking the front left stub axle carrier casting number Where necessary replace the stub axle carrier.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 187 vehicles

R/2017/1359 May 2017Built 2014–2016Outer skin of rear spoiler may detach

The outer part (skin) of the rear spoiler may detach from the vehicle and /or the pins on the glass tailgate. There would be no warning to the customer. However the possibility of detachment is increased due to the use of car washes.

Fix: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and fit additional re-enforcement to the spoiler and bonnet.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 5,623 vehicles

R/2017/1369 May 2017Built 2014–2015Outer skin of rear spoiler and bonnet may detach

Operations 1) or 2) or operations 1) and 2) could be required: 1) The upper part of the bonnet (the bonnet skin) may detach from the rest of the bonnet due to poor adhesive being applied at the factory and deterioration over time. There would be no obvious signs to the customer. 2) The outer part (skin) of the rear spoiler may detach from the vehicle and /or the pins on the glass tailgate. There would be no warning to the customer.

Fix: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and add re-enforcement to the spoiler and/or bonnet or both as required.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 4,056 vehicles

R/2015/13223 Jun 2015Built 2014Possibility of loss of control

The front shock absorber (strut) mounting for the anti-roll bar rod may not be welded correctly. If the welding should fail there will initially be noise leading to the possibility for adversely affected vehicle handling because the anti-roll bar will no longer be connected the risk of contact and damage to the wheel rim tyre brake hose and ABS cable.

Fix: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and check the shocker absorber (strut) build dates. The shock absorber that are in the affected range will be replaced.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 1,022 vehicles

R/2015/07526 Mar 2015Built 2014Risk of unintended acceleration

Due to an error in the engine ECU software it is possible that the vehicle will suffer an unintended acceleration or not able to decelerate. The driver should still be able to control the vehicle by applying the brakes and manipulating the clutch and gears.

Fix: Recall all affected vehicles to reprogram the engine ECU with new software.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 1,115 vehicles

R/2015/06526 Mar 2015Built 2014Seatbelts may malfunction in a collision

Due to an error in the manufacturing process the seat belt buckle may not retain the belt during a frontal impact.

Fix: On affected vehicles check build date of seat belt assembly and replace if necessary.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 393 vehicles

R/2014/17910 Mar 2015Built 2014Seatbelt buckle may not hold seatbelt tongue

Seat belt tongue may not hold in the buckle sufficiently. In a collision the tongue may separate from the buckle putting the occupant of the affected belt at risk.

Fix: Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and replace the seatbelt buckle on the passenger side (x 75) and driver side (x6).

Recalled models: TWINGO · 393 vehicles

R/2009/0936 Oct 2009Built 2008–2009Drivers seat may not lock safely

It has been identified that the driver's seat may suffer permanent or intermittent non-locking on it's runners. This can occur when the vehicle is stationary or when being driven..

Fix: Recalled vehicles will have a latch fitted to the seat's locking device.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 663 vehicles

R/2002/1562 Dec 2002Built 2002Possible loss of brake servo assistance

There is a risk of a loss of brake servo assistance due to the incorrect positioning of the air pressure sensor in the inlet manifold.

Fix: Check the position of the air pressure sensor and correct where necessary.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 1,861 vehicles

R/2001/16110 Jan 2002Built 2001Door security concern

Customers may find that they are unable to secure the front and side doors of their vehicles due to wear of the locking bolt due to omission of heat treatment.

Fix: Rectified by replacing both the front and side door locks.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 1,445 vehicles

R/2000/07218 Sept 2000Possible inadvertent deployment of both airbags

The computer which controls the deployment of the Airbags may be incorrectly programmed. The Airbags may inadvertently deploy.

Fix: Recall affected vehicles and change the computer which controls the deployment of the Airbags.

Recalled models: TWINGO · 17 vehicles

DVSA vehicle safety recalls (Crown copyright, Open Government Licence).

Checking a Renault Twingo before you buy

Look at the parts above at the viewing, and read the car’s own MOT history: advisories for the same parts suggest the problem is already starting. Sweep’s free check shows every MOT, advisory and mileage reading for a registration.

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT tests 2023 (Open Government Licence v3.0). Failure rates compare this model with all cars in the same age band. Fix prices are typical independent-garage estimates.
Sweep for ChromeComing soon

Run this check on every listing, automatically.

The Sweep extension finds the reg on AutoTrader, eBay, Gumtree and Facebook Marketplace adverts, then shows the MOT history and any red flags beside the advert.

Coming soon to the Chrome Web Store. Free, like the check.